'It is the inevitable inference from that that the defendant's daily visits to Mrs Davison were not prompted by benevolence towards the old lady but provided an opportunity to exploit her and steal her money.'I have no doubt that the defendant had been helping herself over the months to Mrs Davison's money to ease her chronic debt problem.'James was warned she will serve the full 20 year tariff, less the days she has spent in jail on remand, before she can even be considered for release."You can design a bot to fool fraud detection." But, in the case of a number of dating sites, developers aren't trying to weed out fake profiles — they are tirelessly writing scripts and algorithms to unleash more of them.It’s the dirtiest secret of the billion online dating business and it stretches far beyond Ashley Madison.The judge said: 'In her account of what happened to the police, and indeed to the jury, she even threw in a few extra salacious details in an attempt to give spurious authenticity to her untrue story.' As she was led away to start serving her life sentence, James told members of her family in the public gallery she would hold her 'head high'.James, aka Briggs, of Springwell Road, Sunderland, had denied murder and said Mrs Davison was 'like a nana' to her.Last July, he found out that he wasn't the only one getting the silent treatment.
She was contracted to tend to Mrs Davison, who lived at Emblehope House, Farringdon, just one day per week but would visit almost every day.
He said: 'I have no doubt that this report of a burglary in August 2009 was an invention by the defendant.
'The only reason for such an invention must be to cover up the fact she had been systematically stealing from Mrs Davison over some considerable period.
"The only way you can compete with fraud is you let people know it's fraud," he tells me.
"And it happens across the industry."Conru and AFF's CEO, Jon Buckheit, another Stanford Ph.